Full Proposal Grading Rubric
QEP Full Proposal Evaluation Rubric
Project: ________________________________________________ Reviewer: ________________________
There are a number of specific proposal elements described in the Full Proposal Guidelines. Each rubric component pertains to a section and numbered item in the Full Proposal Guidelines. These are indicated in each of the rubric components.
|
Score |
Item |
Comments |
|
|
Abstract (Section 1 - 2.a & b) 0 – No abstract is provided 1 – Abstract is provided
|
|
|
|
Main Body of Proposal (Definition of the problem. Section 2 – 3.a) 0 – Contains no statement of rationale 2 – Rationale is stated only in general terms 4 – Rationale is specific 6 – Rationale is specific and provides a convincing case for the project
|
|
|
|
Main Body of Proposal (Literature Review. Section 2 – 3.a) 0 – Contains no literature review 1 – Lit Review is incomplete or not current 2 – Lit Review is complete and mostly current 3 – Lit Review is thorough and current |
|
|
|
Establishing Need - What is the relationship of the proposal to the University’s goals and/or needs? (Section 2 – 3.b) 0 – No clear relationship is demonstrated 4 – Demonstrates a clear relationship to at least one goal or need. 6 – Demonstrates a clear relationship to multiple goals or needs.
|
|
|
|
Student Learning Outcomes -- What will students be expected to know or be able to do as a result of this project? (Section 2 – 4.a) 0 – Proposal does not address student learning outcomes 2– Includes vague or inappropriately constructed student learning outcomes 4 – Provides appropriately constructed student learning outcomes 6 – Clearly describes appropriately constructed student learning outcomes including both direct and indirect.
|
|
|
|
The Purpose and Plan of Action - What activities will be used in this project? (Section 2 – 5.b) 0 – No specific actions are described 2 – Provides only general descriptions of actions without alignment with needs or learning outcomes 4 – Provides clearly described and specific actions aligned with needs and learning outcomes 6 – Provides clearly described and specific actions aligned with needs and learning outcomes. Evidence of best practices or literature citations is included. Responsibilities are documented.
|
|
|
|
Timeline for project activities and events -- What is the sequence of project activities and events? (Section 2 – 5.c) 0 – Timeline is not provided 1 – Timeline is provided but is not specific and/or realistic 2 – Timeline is appropriate but not fully developed or convincing 3 – Timeline is specific, clear, and reasonable given scope of project and existing constraints
|
|
|
|
Assessment Plan for the Project: -- Assessment (Section 3 – 6.a) 0 – No assessment plan is provided 2 – Someoutcomeassessment procedures are provided but the project focuses most heavily on indirectmeasures of student learning. 4 – Outcomes assessment procedures include directmeasures of student learning but are described only in general terms 6 – Outcomes assessment procedures include directmeasures that are clearly described and feasible and the relationship to the outcomes presented in Section 2 – 4.a is clear.
|
|
|
|
Resources needed -- What resources will be needed to carry out this project? (Section 4 – 9a,b,c) 0 – Plan does not address resources needed 2 – Plan describes resource needs which are insufficient for scope of project or excessive for scope of project 4 – Plan describes resource needs that can be adapted to the project 6 – Plan describes resource needs that are appropriate and sufficient to the project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Point Total:
|
Overall Evaluation
____ Recommend reject
____ Recommend consideration for final QEP topic
|
|

